So you want to answer the Call for Papers? It includes suggestions for the content and presentation associated with the abstract, as well as examples of the best abstracts submitted to the 2012-2013 selection that is abstract for the ninth annual new york State University graduate student history conference.
Typically, an abstract describes the topic you desire to present during the conference, highlighting your argument, evidence and contribution into the literature that is historical. It will always be limited to 250-500 words. The word limit can be challenging: some graduate students try not to fret on the limit that is short hastily write and submit an abstract during the last second, which regularly hurts their likelihood of being accepted; other students attempt to condense the Next Great American Novel into 250 words, which is often equally damning. Graduate students who approach the abstract early, plan accordingly, and carefully edit are those most frequently invited to essay writing service provide their research. For those who are intimidated because of the project, don’t be – the abstract is a form that is fairly standardized of. Stick to the guidelines that are basic and prevent common pitfalls and you’ll greatly boost your abstract.
Diligently follow all style that is abstract formatting guidelines. Most CFPs will specify page or word length, and perhaps some layout or style guidelines. Some CFPs, however, will list very specific restrictions, including font, font size, spacing, text justification, margins, how to present quotes, how to present authors and works, whether to include footnotes or otherwise not. Make certain you strictly stay glued to all guidelines, including submission instructions. If a CFP does not provide style that is abstract formatting guidelines, it really is generally appropriate to stay around 250 words – abstract committees read many of these things plus don’t look fondly on comparatively long abstracts. Make certain you orient your abstract topic to address any specific CFP themes, time periods, methods, and/or buzzwords.
With a 250-500 word limit, write only what is necessary, avoiding wordiness. Use active voice and pay attention to excessive phrasing that is prepositional.
Plan your abstract carefully before writing it. A good abstract will address the following questions: what’s the historical question or problem? Contextualize your topic. What exactly is your thesis/argument? It ought to be original. What is your evidence? State forthrightly that you are using source material that is primary. How does your paper fit into the historiography? What’s going on in the area of study and how does your paper contribute to it? How does it matter? We realize the topic is essential to you personally, why should it is important to the selection committee that is abstract?
You should be as specific as possible, avoiding overly broad or statements that are overreaching claims. And that is it: don’t get sidetracked by writing an excessive amount of narrative or over explaining. Say what you ought to say and absolutely nothing more.
Keep your audience in mind. How much background you give on an interest depends on the conference. Could be the conference a broad humanities conference, a graduate that is general history conference, or something more specific like a 1960s social revolutions conference? Your pitch should be worthy of the specificity regarding the conference: the more specific the subject, the less background that is broad want to give and vice versa.
Revise and edit your abstract to ensure that its presentation that is final is free. The editing phase is also the time that is best to visit your abstract as a whole and chip away at unnecessary words or phrases. The final draft should be linear and clear and it also should read smoothly. If you’re tripping over something while reading, the abstract selection committee will as well. Ask another graduate student to see your abstract to ensure its clarity or attend a Graduate Student Writing Group meeting.
Your language must certanly be professional and your style should abide by standards that are academic. Contractions might be appealing because of the expressed word limits, nonetheless they must certanly be avoided. If citation guidelines are not specifically given, it really is appropriate to utilize the author’s name and title of work (in either italics or quotation marks) within the text rather than use footnotes or in-text citations.
While one question, if really good, can be posed in your abstract, you need to avoid writing one or more (maybe two, if really really good). Should you pose a question or two, ensure that you either answer it or address why the question matters to your conference paper – unless you’re posing an evident rhetorical question, you shouldn’t just let a question hang there. A lot of questions uses up too much space and leaves less room for you to build your argument, methods, evidence, historiography, etc. Often times, posing way too many questions leaves the abstract committee wondering if you are planning to deal with one or all in your paper and in case you even know the answers to them. Remember, you are not likely to have already written your conference paper, but you are required to own done enough research that you will be ready to talk about a particular topic that you can adequately cover in 15-20 minutes. Demonstrate that you have inked so.
Language that helps you be as specific as you are able to in presenting your argument is excellent but don’t get your readers bogged down in jargon. They’ll be reading plenty of abstracts and won’t would you like to wade through the language that is unnecessary. Ensure that it stays simple.
When students repeat claims, they often don’t realize these are typically doing this. Sometimes this occurs because students are not yet clear on their argument. Consider it even more and then write. In other cases, students write carelessly and do not proofread. Make sure each sentence is exclusive and that it plays a role in the flow of the abstract.
The committee that is abstract not need to be reminded associated with grand sweep of history in order to contextualize your topic. Place your topic specifically within the historiography.
The samples below represent the five highest scoring samples submitted to the selection committee for the ninth annual graduate student history conference, 2012-2013. Two of the samples below were subsequently selected for publication in the NC State Graduate Journal of History. Outstanding papers presented at the graduate student history conference are recommended for publication by panel commentators. Papers go through a peer review process before publication.